USCIS Memorandum PA-2026-05, dated August 5, 2026, expands officers’ authority to deny incomplete filings immediately — without a second chance.
When can this happen?
Why is it now especially important to submit a complete package the first time?
What worries immigration attorneys the most?
And what should you do to avoid losing your filing fee, your place in line, and sometimes even the ability to file again?
1. Overview
2. How the System Worked Before
2.1. What USCIS Is and What Types of Cases It Handles
2.2. The Form and the Evidence
2.3. How RFEs and NOIDs Worked
3. What Memorandum PA-2026-05 Changes
3.1. Denial Without an RFE or NOID
3.2. Shorter Response Deadlines
3.3. Less Time for Mail Sent Abroad
3.4. One Response Closes the RFE
3.5. The Rules Also Apply to Cases Already Filed
4. What Attorneys Are Worried About
4.1. The Line Between Initial and Additional Evidence
4.2. What Does “Enough” Evidence Mean?
4.3. USCIS’s Own Errors
4.4. The Risk of Denials Over Minor Issues
5. What to Do Now
5.1. Prepare a Complete Package the First Time
5.2. Read the Current Instructions and the Law
5.3. More Is Better Than Less
5.4. Keep Proof of What You Filed
5.5. Watch Your Mail and Keep Your Address Current
6. Conclusion
7. Memorandum, Forms, and Materials
At the center of this discussion is USCIS Memorandum PA-2026-05, which addresses the rules for submitting evidence to the agency.
According to USCIS, the purpose of the changes is to fight fraud and discourage people from filing deliberately empty applications just to obtain work authorization or secure a place in line. The mechanism is to allow officers to deny those filings immediately, without first giving the applicant a chance to fix the deficiencies.
A Request for Evidence — RFE — or a Notice of Intent to Deny — NOID — is no longer required. If an officer decides that the initial filing does not contain the necessary evidence, the case may end in a denial. The filing fee is not refunded, and a new filing means preparing the package again and going to the back of the line.
The memorandum also allows some response deadlines to be shortened and changes the way RFEs are handled. The basic point is simple: documents that could often be submitted later should now, whenever possible, be included from the start.
USCIS is a large immigration agency within the Department of Homeland Security. Its main function is to process immigration requests, or “benefits,” filed by noncitizens in the United States.
The range of cases is very broad: family reunification, asylum filed outside removal proceedings, permanent residence, work authorization, and the production and delivery of green cards and other immigration documents.
The agency is funded primarily by the filing fees applicants pay when they submit their cases.
Most filings can be thought of as having two parts: the form itself and the documents that prove the person is entitled to what they are requesting.
For example, a family petition on Form I-130 should include evidence of the marriage and evidence that the marriage is genuine. An application for work authorization based on an asylum case must include proof that the asylum case was actually filed and accepted.
The problem is that it is not always possible to assemble the entire file at once. A certificate may still be processing in another country, a document may not yet be translated, some evidence may not yet be relevant, or it simply may not arrive before the deadline.
For many years, it was common practice to file the form on time and submit the missing evidence later. That was often done, for example, with Form I-130 or Form I-589.
If USCIS opened a case and saw that evidence was missing, the officer would usually send a Request for Evidence — an RFE — and give the applicant time to fix the problem.
After the missing materials were submitted, processing continued. There was no automatic denial, no lost filing fee, and no new place at the back of the line.
And RFEs did not arrive only because applicants made mistakes. Sometimes the agency itself failed to notice or lost documents that had already been submitted. The Russian article gives a recent example in which USCIS failed to see Form I-130A, and the form had to be sent again.
In most cases, applicants were given about twelve weeks to respond. If the notice was mailed abroad, additional time was generally added for international delivery.
The main change is that USCIS once again allows officers, in their discretion, to deny filings when the required initial evidence was not submitted from the beginning.
An RFE or NOID before the denial is no longer required. The only way to correct the mistake may be to file the entire package again — with a new filing fee and a new place in line.
At the same time, the memorandum does not require officers to deny every such case. The decision still rests with the individual officer and depends on the facts of the case. But the option of an immediate denial has now been expressly restored to USCIS practice.
The second change is that if an officer does decide to issue an RFE, the officer may give less time to respond than the standard twelve weeks that had been used in many cases.
In other words, applicants can no longer assume they will have the familiar three months to order certificates, obtain translations, and gather documents.
Previously, fourteen days were automatically added to the response deadline for correspondence sent abroad to account for international delivery.
Under the new rule, that extra time is eliminated. Only the general three-day mailing period remains.
The RFE response process is changing as well. Under the new rules, once a response is submitted, the file is closed to further supplementation: you will no longer be able to send another document later or ask for additional time.
That means an RFE response now needs to be prepared as a final package, not as the first stage of an ongoing document submission.
The memorandum applies to all filings currently pending with USCIS, including cases filed before the memorandum was published.
The agency’s position is that the law itself is not changing; rather, USCIS is clarifying how officers may use authority they already had. USCIS therefore considers applying the policy to already-pending cases permissible.
The memorandum distinguishes between “initial” evidence — documents expressly required by the instructions for the form — and additional evidence that an officer may request later.
The new rules primarily concern initial evidence. On paper, that makes sense: a person cannot be penalized for failing to submit a document that no one had yet required.
But in practice, the line between those categories is not always clear.
A good example is Form I-130. The instructions require “one or more” documents showing that the marriage is genuine. But they do not explain exactly how much evidence is enough.
Read literally, the minimum requirement can be satisfied with very little. In practice, attorneys always submit more.
The key question now is whether an officer may go beyond checking whether the required evidence is present and instead decide that what was submitted is not enough — and deny the case immediately.
That is what concerns immigration attorneys the most: the possibility that the difference between “evidence was submitted” and “I do not think this is enough evidence” could become a basis for an immediate denial.
Another problem is the agency’s own mistakes. USCIS regularly requests documents that were already submitted, sometimes even in electronically filed cases.
In the past, that kind of mistake usually meant lost time and extra correspondence. Now the same mistake could, at least in theory, result in a denial.
A decision can formally be challenged, including through Form I-290B. But that means another filing fee and additional months of waiting. There is usually no way to simply call USCIS and quickly correct the mistake.
There is also a more serious concern: the new authority could be used to deny otherwise legitimate cases over a formally missing document.
The Russian article gives the example of birth certificates for the beneficiary’s children in an I-130 case. USCIS began requesting those certificates even when the children themselves were not included in the petition. In the past, those documents could simply be submitted in response to an RFE. Now, at least in theory, failing to include such a document in the initial filing could become a basis for denial without warning.
How this will work in practice is still unknown. The memorandum is new, and there is not yet an established body of practice under it.
The main rule now is simple: prepare the case as if you will have no opportunity at all to submit something later.
A forgotten marriage certificate, a missing record, or an untranslated document — all the things that could often be fixed later in the past — may now result in a denial.
In some categories, a new filing is possible. In others, if the deadline has already passed, it may be impossible to fix the problem by filing again.
First and foremost, rely on the primary source: the current instructions for the specific form and the applicable law.
Do not rely on old manuals, online summaries, or artificial intelligence. Read the instructions yourself and make sure you are using the latest version of both the form and the instructions.
It now makes sense to read the instructions broadly. If there is a genuine uncertainty, it is better to include the document than to save it for later.
Do not file a case “for later completion” if you can avoid it. If an important certificate is not ready or a translation has not been completed, it may be safer to wait until the package is complete.
There are exceptions, especially when a deadline is approaching. But if you have to file anyway, you should at least satisfy every mandatory minimum requirement in the instructions. An essentially empty petition now almost guarantees a serious problem.
Always keep copies of everything you send to USCIS, even when you file electronically.
A cover letter listing the enclosures, postal receipts and tracking, electronic filing confirmations, and screenshots all become especially important if the agency later claims that a document was not in the file.
If USCIS makes a mistake, your own proof of filing may be the only way to show that the document was submitted on time.
Monitor both regular mail and electronic notices. Make sure USCIS has your current address even if you have an online account.
If your address changes, you file Form AR-11. You have ten days to do so.
USCIS is inconsistent: sometimes an RFE appears only on paper, and sometimes only in the online account. Postal errors happen as well. If response deadlines are getting shorter, every lost day matters.
Practice is already changing. Attorneys are increasingly reluctant to save evidence “for later” — whether in I-130, I-751, or I-864 filings.
Memorandum PA-2026-05 changes not so much the list of required documents as the cost of making a mistake. What once often resulted in an RFE and a later submission may now result in an immediate denial, loss of the filing fee, and a new place at the back of the line.
So you should plan for the worst-case scenario: documents that the instructions require with the initial filing should be in the case from the beginning. If there is a question, it is better to resolve it before filing than to count on receiving an RFE.
And always keep proof of exactly what was submitted. Under the new practice, a USCIS mistake may become much more expensive than it was before.
USCIS Memorandum PA-2026-05 dated August 5, 2026 — allows officers, in appropriate cases, to deny filings without first issuing an RFE or NOID when required initial evidence was not submitted with the original filing; it also changes certain deadlines and aspects of the RFE response process.
Form I-130 — a family-based immigration petition that illustrates particularly well the difference between evidence that must be filed initially and materials USCIS may request later.
Form I-130A — supplemental information about the spouse beneficiary in applicable spousal cases.
Form I-589 — the application for asylum and withholding of removal; the Russian article uses it as an example of a form that, in the past, was often filed before the entire evidence package had been fully assembled.
Form I-290B — the form used for certain appeals and motions to reopen or reconsider USCIS decisions.
Form AR-11 — used to notify USCIS of a change of address.
Form I-751 and Form I-864 — two more examples of filing categories where evidence preparation is already becoming more conservative, with fewer materials being saved “for later.”
← Home, Russian version, Blog